NUT Annual Conference

April 2001

Cardiff

In this Briefing:

  1. 35-hour Week?
  2. Professional Unity
  3. Threshold Costs
  4. Allegations of Abuse
  5. Disruption & Violence
  6. Cover to contract

Historic Resolution

The Conferences of the ATL, NASUWT and NUT all passed an identical resolution, for the first time in history! The motion condemns the STRB and Government for failing to act against teacher overload and seeks an independent inquiry to encompass all aspects of teachers’ conditions, pay levels and salary structure.
The motion also pointed to the settlement in Scotland which, amongst other things, limited the working week to 35 hours. The common motion went on to declare that "in the event of the Government failing to set up such an inquiry, or to take other appropriate measures, the NUT along with ATL, NASUWT and UCAC** will take effective action, short of strike action, initially to limit teachers’ working time to no more than 35 hours per week."

Professional Unity

This was also the first conference to be addressed by representatives of the ATL (General Secretary, Peter Smith) and the NASUWT (Assistant Secretary, Martin Johnson). Professional Unity was a major theme throughout Conference, not least because of the joint
resolution on workload, but also because the ATL has now joined the TUC and the NUT has been taking coordinated action on workload, teacher shortages and bureaucracy together with the NASUWT. Communications and working relationships with the other unions have never been stronger.
(** UCAC is a teacher Union in Wales.)

________________

The Cost of the Threshold

In his address, in-coming National President, John Illingworth, listed the costs of the threshold fiasco, according to official DfEE estimates. It comes to about £150 million pounds, so far:
Assessor training £27.5m
Head’s training £8.6m
Teacher INSET £50m
Time spent on applications £47.3m
Assessors’ visits £15m
- to which can be added the future cost of reviews and tribunals arising from appeals. John went on to say: "Many were strongly opposed to the process even though they applied. The process was demeaning enough, but many object to an outcome that leads to them earning more than colleagues they work alongside. This has not been a team building initiative...... Surely it would have been better value for money to provide all teachers with a decent pay rise. All would have been motivated. Precious resources could have been put to good use rather than wasted on bureaucracy."
nutlogo2.gif

A Report from the Suffolk Division of the NUT

Page 1

Allegations of abuse

A motion calling for changes in procedures when children or others make allegations against teachers was well received by both the Welsh Assembly and Secretary of State, David Blunkett, who promised an urgent review.
Conference was addressed by Marje Evans, the NUT head-teacher from Gwent who had been pursued for 18 months as a result of, largely unknown, charges accusing her of having slapped an unruly child. Marje was eventually cleared of all charges and disciplinary action, with the help of NUT Cymru and NUT Headquarters.
The motion calls for rapid investigation of allegations, to establish innocence quickly where this is appropriate, and to preserve anonymity of the accused teacher. The Secretary of State has accepted the Union’s call and there will be talks with police, social services and the DfEE to seek common, nationally implemented procedures to seek to remove the stress and anxiety that occurs.
Marje is not alone and we have cases in Suffolk where the reaction of the child protection agencies is out of all proportion to the alleged offence and where the "investigation" is prejudicial and flawed.

_________________________ Unacceptable Behaviour

The NUT is pro-inclusion and our policy is that children with Special Educational Needs of all descriptions should normally be educated in their neighbourhood school.
However, the NUT has also always underlined that the neighbourhood school can only do this if the provision available can be as supportive,
specialised and as well-equipped as would be available in separate Special provision, and where there is no detrimental impact on the rest of the pupils and staff.
Our local opposition to the inclusion of some violent and disruptive pupils, and to the closure of Oakwood, has always been because Suffolk has failed to produce specialised provision at neighbourhood level.
Conference passed a resolution calling upon school staff and pupils to be protected from violent pupils, but went on to spell out the kind of measures that would be required for inclusion of EBD pupils to work. These included:
  • training for all staff;
  • extra staff for early intervention;
  • counsellors in every school
  • support from mental health agencies;
  • flexible placements in PRUs or EBD schools to maintain contact with school, and to seek re-integration;
  • a behaviour support team of experienced practitioners of sufficient size to work across all schools;
  • funding arrangements which promote individual remedies for each EBD pupil without penalising schools which have to exclude if unable to provide the specialist care.
More detail

_________________________ Cover to Contract

The NUT National Executive agreed to suspend the "cover to contract" joint action with the NASUWT following their announcement in March. The NUT only agreed to such a suspension on condition that members in schools such as Holywells continued to be
protected from the excessive workload involved in covering for unfilled vacancies. The Union is anxious to maintain a common approach with the NASUWT and to be included in any talks about a new contract for teachers, which the LEAs’ representative, Graham Lane, indicated would be on the table.
Graham Lane repeated this in his address to Conference, in which he also praised the NUT for being the only teachers’ union to have fought consistently for the restoration of the right for teachers to negotiate with their employers on pay and conditions (removed illegally by the Conservative Government when it created the STRB).
The Union has made it clear that members in Holywells and any other school protected by the ballot, remain protected from overload during the period of suspension, and that the action will be reinstated if the employers try to return to expecting cover beyond contractual obligations.

__________________

The President’s address pointed out that League Tables never applied in Scotland, have been abolished in N. Ireland and are on the way out in Wales.
On the teacher supply crisis, he called for OFSTED inspectors and threshold assessors to be drafted back into the classroom . "This would be a cost-free initiative and would have the added bonus of allowing inspectors to refresh their classroom experience".

____________________

Published by the Suffolk Division NUT 1 Gainsborough Road BURY ST EDMUNDS, IP33 3RX ( & FAX 01284 763980 martingoold@suffolknut.org.uk www.suffolknut.org.uk