Click here to open as full screen
These notes are up-dated regularly and not completed / finalised until the day before the next meeting. If you are accessing this page shortly after a previous meeting, click on "Previous Meeting" below for the latest news.
Notes for September 2008
![]() |
Suffolk
Division NUT IPSWICH Thursday September 25th 2008 Venue: Belstead Brook Hotel, Ipswich |
Apologies already recorded: Peter Byatt, Paul Widdowson.
Section A: National with National Executive Report
| Harassment on Grounds of Sex | New section 4A of the SDA gives a new definition of harassment and removes the causal link between unlawful discriminatory sexual harassment and the sex of the person being harassed. The old statutory definition required that the harassment must be on the ground of ‘his or her sex,’ which meant that the legislation did not protect an employee from harassment on the ground of someone else’s sex, such as the sex of the harasser. The new definition provides that employees are protected from harassment if the unwanted conduct is related to ‘his or her sex or that of another person’. It makes it clear that men and women are protected from harassment on grounds of sex whether it is the sex of the harasser, the harassed or a person that the harassed person associates with. |
| Harassment by Pupils or Parents or Other Third Parties | The SDA has also been amended to cover specifically third party harassment. The NUT has argued consistently that teachers should be protected from harassment from parents and pupils. The new sections 6(2B) to 6(2D) provide that if an employee is subjected to harassment in the course of his or her employment and the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the third party from harassing him or her, the employer will be treated as subjecting the employee to harassment. The employer will only be liable if it knows that the employee has been subjected to harassment by a third party (any third party) in the course of his or her employment on at least two other occasions. Divisions are urged to ensure that:
|
| Flexible working | The Government proposes to extend the right to request flexible working to parents of children up to the age of 16. The regulations have not yet been published so there is no implementation date as yet, it is however anticipated that the change will be introduced in April 2009. |
| Terms, conditions and pay during Maternity Leave | The regulations improve the rights of women on maternity leave by removing the distinction between (a) terms and conditions during ordinary maternity leave (OML) and (b) terms and conditions during additional maternity leave (AML). New section 6A of the SDA will apply to women whose babies are expected to be born on or after 5 October 2008. Women who qualify will be entitled to the same terms and conditions during AML as OML. During OML and AML, women will be:
|
LGBT Teachers’ Conference 200817-18 October 2008 Old Ship Hotel Brighton
Black Teachers’ Conference 2008 31 October- 2 November 2008 Stoke Rochford Hall Grantham
Disabled Teachers’ Conference Saturday, 8 November 2008 NUT Headquarters London
The other teacher organisations, including ATL and NASUWT, have accepted proposals from the DCSF which could worsen part-time teacher's pay and conditions. The NUT has responded to the draft 2008 STP&C Document and has called for the following changes to the draft STPCD to protect part-time teachers:
|
|
|
|
| Option 1: A single secondary school for Felixstowe | Option 2: both Orwell and Deben to continue as separate schools |
If you agree with Option 1: |
|
| Should 11-16 facilities be provided on the Orwell site and 16-19 on the Deben site? | |
| Should these schools be (a) open to competition or (b) not open to competition | |
| Qu 4: How concerned would you be by the lost of parental choice of school if Deben and Orwell become a single school? | |
| Qu 5: A single secondary school for Felixstowe for all students aged 11-19 could be created on the Orwell site. Such a school would have approx 1800 students. Do you think this would be too large a school? | |
| Yr 1 | SCC to charge £1 per day; SEBC 60p (SCC Chief Officers to pay £1.50) |
| Yr 2 | SCC and SEBC to charge £1.20 (SCC COs £1.50) |
| Yr 3 | All employees: £1.50 |
| SCC will continue not to charge those considered to be Essential Users at all. The NUT has raised the issue of unfairness over the allocation of "Essential user" status, as some peripatetic staff are not considered "essential" car users, while some senior officers are. The joint committee has decided that it will not, however, review its EU policy, until after decisions have been made re. the Local Government Review. | |
| SCC proposes to give its staff on grades 1-4 50p per day extra, regardless of whether they use the car park - this was done re. Endeavour Ho, and is designed to encourage staff to use alternative transport (e.g. it can be pocketed if people walk/cycle, use a free bus or used to subsidise bus fares. | |
| Although not included in the current papers, it is intended that there will be a free bus services to WSH taking in the town centre, train and bus stations. | |
| We have been assured that there will be "ample" visitor parking spaces, but it is unclear if peripatetic staff will be able to be "visitors". | |
| 14-19 Implementation | JNC received a report from martin Slattery, including: "The 14-19 strategy has a budget of some £3m over the next 3 years to support the Phase 2 Delivery Plan and its attendant workstreams: marketing , curriculum development, IAF, employer engagement, workforce development and CPD, accommodation, transport and VLE (Virtual Learning Environment) and Partnership working. (incidentally, that works out at around just £24,000 per year per educational establishment catering for KS4 and/or 16-19. |
| Exit Surveys | The LA have promised to ensure that these forms are always sent out to those leaving their posts for whatever reason and to report back on outcomes. |
| Pupil Panels | The Teachers' Panel lodged objections to pupil panels taking an active part in decision-making over appointments of teaching staff, particularly where there were internal candidates. |
| Occupational Health and Stress | The Teachers' Panel, as proposed by NUT, have expressed concern re. the Occupational Health Service over recent months. There has been a rapid turn-over of staff and an apparent lack of knowledge about the JNC Agreement on Industrial Injury. There has been confusion over "Industrial Injury" in the Benefits Agency sense and the terms of the Burgundy Book for occupational sick pay arrangements. 2 NUT cases have been awaiting a decision on "Industrial Injury" from OH for nearly 9 months, and the LA feels unable to set up the Ind Injury panel until they have had the initial assessment from OH. In the meantime, members suffer half pay and nil pay, when possibly they are victims of conditions or an incident at work. |
| National Challenge | The NUT's resolution on "National Challenge", which named 3 Suffolk schools as "failing", was agreed by the Teachers' Panel and put to the JNC. |
Date of next meeting: November 13th 2008