Schools report inadequate budget
Are you getting enough?
The hype
"Government has recognised its responsibility to provide additional resources in support of the Agreement. In England, this funding will ensure that the Government meets its manifesto pledge of at least an extra 10,000 teachers during this Parliament. It also estimates that schools will be able to appoint at least 50,000 extra support staff of all types during the same period." (`Time for Standards`, The Government`s Agreement` on workload) 15 January 2003
The reality
Schools now know their funding allocations for the 20032004 financial year. Many schools are having to consider employing fewer teachers and fewer support staff. Some are considering redundancies.
The costs
The increase in teachers` pay is derisory. Schools have to meet the increased employers` contributions to National Insurance and superannuation. There are insufficient funds for reductions in class size and for early years` provision.
Workload
From 1 September 2003, at the latest, schools will be required to transfer 25 workload tasks to support staff. This is the first step in reducing teacher workload. Protection One reason why the NUT refused to sign the Government`s agreement is the absence of any clause which protects teachers` jobs. The spectre of redundancy haunts our schools, for teachers and support staff. Supply teachers may face less work and parttime teachers no work.
The NUT will take all steps necessary to protect jobs and ensure there is no worsening in the teacher provision in schools.
General Secretary, Doug McAvoy, said: "Parents may believe that Government investment and increased Council taxes will guarantee schools the funds necessary for high quality education. If that is not happening, we need to know. We can campaign with parents for more resources. We can ensure support and protection for you and your pupils. Teachers want reduced workload not no work."
How is it for you?
Ask your headteacher whether the budget for your school: