Notes for Division Meeting: April 25th 2002

Previous Meeting's notes (February 28th 2002)

Secretary's Annual Report, AGM 2002

nutlogo

Suffolk Division NUT
Executive Committee (17:30 - 18:45)
and DIVISION COUNCIL MEETING (18:45 - 21:00)

April 25th 2002 Venue: Stowmarket Local Learning Centre

Apologies already recorded: For EC / Both: Tricia Andrews; John Dixon may be late for EC.For Council: .Jenny Mosesson may be late.

Part 1: Information, Reports and Matters Arising

*=Items for Executive Committee

dot=Items for Division Council

Section A: National with National Executive Report

  1. dotNUT News No 6: Teachers United on Workload. Reporting on the common motion at the three main Conferences calling for an improved contract and more support staff.
  2. dotNUT News No 7: Shady Deal: post-threshold sham and Advice to Headteachers about post-threshold (upper spine) progression. The NAHT and SHA have dropped their threat of boycotting PM and accepted new criteria for the allocation of post-threshold progression. Any such criteria would go against the recommendations of the STRB and should be challenged.
  3. dotJoint NUT and NASUWT advice for headteacher members on Upper Pay Spine Progression + Letter from NUT to all headteachers advising them to:
    • carry out a review of the performance of post threshold teachers
    • use only the criteria published in the School Teachers' Pay and Conditions Document, adding no new criteria or standards
    • evaluate whether teachers have maintained their threshold standards
    • put budgetary considerations to one side while evaluating whether the criteria are met
    • recommend to the governors movement to point 2 of the Upper Pay Spine in respect of all teachers who meet the criteria; and
    • where the governing body, for whatever reason, does not implement the recommendation, the decision and the reasons must be given to the teacher. The headteachers and the teachers affected should seek guidance and support from their professional associations.
    See also circular 02-057-M&C below.
  4. Headway, March 2002, featuring advice on Post Threshold Progression., workload, professional development, *THE RACE RELATIONS (AMENDMENT) ACT 2000 (extensive advice for Heads and Schools), Assessing and monitoring the impact of polices.
  5. Executive News 88 (Circulated for AGM)
  6. London Allowance Campaign: information and posters.
  7. dotCONFERENCE REPORT: From Andrew Guite (Division President)

    And items of correspondence from HQ

  8. dotRe. earlier circular 02/020: Laptops for teachers: NUT briefing says: "All serving teachers in maintained and non-maintained special schools in England will be eligible for the Laptop for Teachers scheme, provided that they have not received a computer in the last three years under a previous Computers for Teachers scheme and any other Government-funded programme. LEAs have been asked to give priority to headteachers who have not been allocated a laptop already. The DfES guidance states: "we would expect teachers who can argue the case for their own personal computer to have signed up for the NOF ICT training as this would give them an effective background in using their laptop to its full advantage". (Hint?!). Unlike previous schemes, teachers will not make personal applications to the DfES. LEAs will purchase the laptops on behalf of schools and schools will allocate them to teachers for their individual use. Ownership will remain with the school. Teachers will not be able to take their laptop with them if they change schools."
  9. *02/030/COS - PARENTAL LEAVE AND MATERNITY LEAVE
    Advice and information. Full briefing posted on Suffolk website.

    From 10 January 2002, statutory entitlements to parental leave under the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999 were extended to all parents with children under five. Previously, parental leave entitlement was available only to parents whose children were born after 15 December 1999. Parental leave entitlements for parents of disabled children have been increased from 13 to 18 weeks. This means that many members who previously did not qualify for the statutory parental leave entitlements will now be able to request parental leave.

    Maternity and Parental Leave : Further Changes from April 2003 include:

    • extension of the period of unpaid maternity leave in order to allow a maximum of 12 months’ maternity leave;
    • extension of the period for which statutory maternity payments are made from the present 18 weeks to 26 weeks;
    • increase in the flat rate Statutory Maternity Pay and Maternity Allowance payments from the present £60.20 per week to £75 per week from April 2002 and £100 from April 2003;
    • introduction of the right to two weeks’ paid paternity leave for working fathers paid at the same flat rate; and
    • introduction of statutory rights to paid adoption leave, which will provide entitlements equal to the above maternity and paternity entitlements to adoptive parents who will be able to choose which of them takes either entitlement.
  10. 02/031/E&EO - THE NEW CONNEXIONS SERVICE AND SCHOOLS
  11. 02/032/E&EO - TUC EDUCATION COURSE: TACKLING RACISM ONLINE
  12. *02/033/E&EO - NATIONAL EDUCATION CONFERENCE 2002
  13. 02/034/E&EO - WITHIN OUR REACH: MEETING SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS - INCLUSION IN PRACTICE
  14. 02/035/E&EO - THE ROLE OF LEARNING AND SKILLS COUNCILS
  15. *02/036/E&EO - NUT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME: APRIL 2002
  16. *02/037/E&EO - GUIDANCE FOR LEAs ON SCHOOLS COLLECTION AND RECORDING DATA ON PUPILS ETHNIC BACKGROUND (IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DATA PROTECTION ACT AND THE 2001 NATIONAL POPULATION CENSUS)
  17. 02/038/E&EO - RE-PAYMENT OF STUDENT LOANS FOR NEW TEACHERS OF SHORTAGE SUBJECTS
  18. dot02/039/E&EO - EVIDENCE TO THE SCHOOL TEACHERS REVIEW BODY ON TEACHERS WORKLOAD: Joint supplementary evidence.
  19. 02/040/SUP - STATE RETIREMENT PENSION INCREASE
  20. 02/041/E&EO - IMPROVING INSPECTION, IMPROVING SCHOOLS - OFSTED CONSULTATION OUTCOMES
  21. *02/042/O&A - E-MAILING OF CIRCULARS TO DIVISIONS AND LOCAL ASSOCIATIONS
  22. *02/043/COS - NUT HEALTH AND SAFETY WORKING GROUP
  23. *02/044/M&C - DEVELOPING A NETWORK OF NUT LEARNING REPRESENTATIVES - ONE DAY CONFERENCE: TUESDAY, 21 MAY 2002
  24. 02/045/CCU - ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2002 - EXECUTIVE PRIORITY MOTION: "Green Paper: Extending Opportunities, Raising Standards".
  25. 02-046-CCU - NURSERY CLASS SIZE ACTION FIGURES
  26. dot02-047-SALS - FUNDING OF SCHOOL SIXTH FORMS
  27. 02-048-E&EO - PRIVATISATION IN EDUCATION
  28. *02-049-CCU - ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2002 - JOINT MOTION FOR TUC AFFILIATES' CONFERENCES: TEACHER WORKLOAD
  29. *02-050-E/EO - NUT BLACK TEACHERS' CONFERENCE 2002
  30. dot02-051-COS - PATTERN OF THE SCHOOL YEAR - LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION PROPOSALS FOR A SIX-TERM YEAR
    The NUT continues to oppose the LGA proposals for the reasons set out below.
    · The proposals would not reduce the current problems of workload, stress and teacher shortage, a fact confirmed by the report commissioned from PricewaterhouseCoopers, by the Government on teacher workload.
    · They might lead to considerable disruption in the organisation of examination timetables. The curriculum and teaching arrangements might need reorganisation.
    · There is no evidence that a six term year would have positive benefits for educational outcomes.
    · The two-week autumn break would fall between two terms of nine and eight weeks, respectively, which are in total considerably longer than the current autumn term, thereby negating the benefits of the longer break.
    · The proposals would be unlikely to reduce pressure upon main holiday periods. · Reorganisation might also lead to revival of LGA proposals for changes in teachers' conditions of service floated in 1999 including, inter alia, lengthening of the working year.
  31. *02-052-E/EO - DISABILITY RIGHTS COMMISSION CODE OF PRACTICE ON PART III OF THE DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT (1995) : RIGHTS OF ACCESS : GOODS, FACILITIES, SERVICES AND PREMISES
  32. 02-053-E/EO - COMMISSION FOR RACE EQUALITY CONSULTATION ON THE DUTY ON PUBLIC AUTHORITIES (INCLUDING SCHOOLS) TO PROMOTE RACE EQUALITY: NUT Response
  33. dot02-055-E/EO - GRADUATE TEACHER PROGRAMME REFORM
    Designated Recommending Bodies (DRBs) are to be established. These are a new type of recommending body which will be allocated GTP places. The process of allocation is similar to that used currently by those wishing to become accredited providers of initial teacher training (ITT).
    Agencies with experience of ITT will be able to bid for designation and an allocation of GTP places. The TTA is particularly keen to encourage the development of partnerships to deliver GTP, such as schools, accredited providers, LEAs and subject specialist groups.
  34. *02-056-CCU - TAXATION OF HONORARIA: There has been a settlement between HQ and the Inland Revenue. Associations which pay less than £1000 in honoraria each year will not be further importuned. There will be further correspondence to Associations from the Inland Revenue. Position needs to be checked out for Division and Associations.
  35. *02-057-M&C - UPPER PAY SCALE - AGREEMENT BETWEEN GOVERNMENT, SHA AND NAHT
    Advice to members is in preparation and will be distributed to NUT school representatives. The Union will establish a register of NUT members who are post-threshold teachers and identify their potential needs for advice, guidance of further representation and support. The Union has protested to the Secretary of State at the reaching of an agreement that materially affects the conditions, pay, pensions and careers of teachers without the involvement of the TUC affiliated unions. The NASUWT has written in similar terms. At the request of the NUT and the NASUWT, the General Secretary of the TUC, John Monks, has written expressing the strong anger and dismay of the TUC at the agreement.
  36. *02/058/E&EO - ONE-DAY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 'CONFERENCES' DURING THE SUMMER TERM 2002
    · Leadership Seminar 'Towards a Participative Approach to School Leadership' (Leading and Managing Professionals) Wednesday, 19 June 2002
    '14-19 Colloquium' Monday, 1 July 2002
    · Symposium 'Men Teaching in Primary and Early Years' Monday, 15 July 2002
  37. *02/068/CCU - MEETING OF DIVISION SECRETARIES - WEDNESDAY, 15 MAY 2002, Hamilaton House. This is the same day as the next full JNC meeting so Secretary, Assistant Secretary and Graham White are all committeed. EC to resolve.
    Section B: Regional: John Dixon to Report
  38. Next Regional Exec/Div Secs' meeting changed to Wed 19th June. Next ERC is Saturday 11th May.
    Section C: Division / County:Division Secretary, Martin Goold, to report, including items from the preceding Executive Committee meeting.
  39. *6-term year in Suffolk: An LEA Officer took great offence at the Division's website headline "Suffolk LEA's proposals for a 6-term year" and responded vigorously to an enquiry from an Ipswich headteacher. Secretary was berated for taking the Learning for Life Panel's decision "to support the implementation of the proposals" as indicating support by the LEA for the proposed dates as published. Secretary has amended the website so as to leave no ambiguity.
  40. *Staff Absence Policies: Schools have been left to their own devices. The LEA has never produced a model policy for schools, although there was a draft prepared a couple of years ago. Secretary is suggesting to the LEA that it would be helpful to have a model policy which would encourage consistency of practice across the LEA's schools. One contentious point in some school policies is the "requirement" to set cover work when off ill! The only guidance available from SCC is in the Personnel Management Manual, dated 1996 and lacking in essentials.
  41. dotNegotiations with the LEA: Advisory Service, 6th March.
    1) Advisory Teachers, pay: LEA said that they could not extend their offer of back pay to September 2000 or January 2001. The teachers' panel therefore believed that we have pushed them as far as we can. DT said that the latest offer of AST 8-12 is better than we would have been offered if it had been concluded around September 2000, and we think that this is probably so. They did make some vague threat of having to slim the service down (i.e. redundancies) if they had to pay out more. The Secretary contacted all members involved, requesting a response on the offer of AST 8-12, with arrears from April 2001 and an increment payable w.e.f. September 2001. If ratified before the end of term, both the new rates, the arrears will be paid in April, and an explanatory letter sent to you to explain how the new rate of pay is calculated.
    2) Advisory Headteachers, pay: LEA agreed to consider making the range L9 to L15 instead of L7 to L13. They have undertaken to respond by the end of term. This would only affect the maximum of the scale and Secretary has consulted on acceptance the assimilation made to L8 or L9 in September 2000 with an increment (and some back-pay therefore) payable from September 2001.
    3) Performance Management/Appraisal: The LEA has confirmed that neither ATs or AHTs will be subject to the teachers'. leadership or AST performance management for teachers. Both will be covered by the LEA officers' "GOLD" Performance and Development Review scheme. This is currently being revised and reprinted. The LEA has undertaken to provide copies to the Unions and to all Advisory Staff. Incremental progression up the spine is NOT dependent on a successful performance review. Progression will be automatic provided there is a satisfactory level of performance.
    4) Holiday Entitlement: The LEA agreed with the NUT that there was no need to change the previously agreed model paragraph ending with "not significantly different from school holidays". The LEA agreed to re-instate that phrase for all ATs and AHTs and to disregard the proposed re-write. This will also write out the proposed reference to a 37-hr week. We all agreed that there is no dispute about the kind of working time that ATs put in to perform their duties.
    5) Conditions of Service: The LEA will prepare a memorandum, to be included in AT and AHTs' contracts, which will itemise which conditions of service apply. General conditions of service applicable to all teachers in the Burgundy book will apply (sickness, maternity and notice). Working time, performance management will be covered as above. This left the area of threshold for those who wished, or who might wish, to return to school teaching in the future. The LEA recognised that, as ATs would be not actually be certified Advanced Skills Teachers, they could not be deemed to have crossed the threshold. The LEA is therefore seeking advice on this.
    6) Anomalies and non-standard AT contracts: It was agreed to deal with these on a casework basis but the LEA accepted straight away your right of members to be accompanied in any discussions/interviews about job evaluation, etc.
  42. Advisory Teachers: follow-up: The LEA have since reneged on their promise to include both arrears and the new pay rates in the April pay cheques. They are now saying this cannot be done until May. Secretary has accompanied 4 ATs in "non-standard" situations to interviews with an officer from County Personnel who reports to Alan Aldred. These have been restricted to establishing just what each job entails. However, as a result of attending these interviews, some personal casework has arisen where differentials prior to assimilation to the Advanced Skills Teacher scale have not been maintained.
  43. The move to Soulbury: The LEA has decided to put 6 former advisory teacher posts onto Soulbury. These were amongst those for whom we were negotiating, but the decision was taken without any further discussion with the Union. All new Area Co-ordinator and Area SENCO posts will be to Soulbury. When the Secretary protested that the Union had not been consulted, AA responded by saying that the NUT was not recognised by the LEA for negotiation on behalf of Soulbury Staff. Secretary is taking this up with Regional Office and Headquarters. Secretary has asked the LEA to reconsider its position on this. AA says the LEA recognises NAIEAC for advisers and AEP for Psychologists. Our point is that they are now appointing teachers to co-ordinator and consultancy posts, on Soulbury, with absolutely no representation recognised! An interesting footnote: the LEA did not recognise NAIEAC in the discussions about Advisory Teachers being put onto Soulbury. The words "cake" and "eating it" come to mind. One snag for teachers having to be paid on Soulbury is that pension arrangements have to be transferred out of the TP, and those who pay AVCs to the teachers' scheme cannot continue to do so.
  44. dotNegotiations with LEA: SEN allowance for teachers in PRUs, March 6th. LEA has rejected the NUT claim for all teachers in PRUs to be paid the first SEN allowance. JCa said that circular 10/94 (which referred to EBD as a SEN) had been superseded. They were unimpressed by the fact that all neighbouring authorities paid this allowance. They were particularly complacent about staffing of existing PRUs. A subsequent survey by the LEA showed that recruitment to PRUs was no different from the recruitment situation generally. The LEA did agree to review the recruitment / retention situation and to consider whether some teachers in PRUs should get the special allowance. They have agreed to report-back in June.
  45. dotNegotiations with LEA, Cover Flexibilities. March 7th. Secretary had to dissuade the LEA from attempting to breach the agreement by encouraging heads to ignore the provision re. dividing a class amongst others. The original SCC draft suggested that there could be local variations. The final version is clearly in keeping with the national agreement. AA also has some problems understanding how part timers can also have "banked" time. AA has also ignored a suggestion that "bankable cover" should be indicated clearly on cover lists/notices at the time of the request to cover, to enable monitoring of fair operation. We still (22/4/2/) await the final version of the SCC guidelines which will be published on the website when finalised.
  46. dotNegotiations with LEA: Ex Gratia Payments March 7th. A draft policy document has been received which reverses the unofficial policy of telling schools not to pay ex gratia payments for loss or damage and includes reference to the Burgundy Book. It has taken a year to get this far since the Secretary raised the lack of proper advice to schools. We still await the final policy and, of course, its distribution to schools. The final version will be published on our website.
  47. Negotiations with County Music Service: Talks have taken place with Philip Shaw on a range of issues raised by the meeting of members before Easter. Secretary to report back via Janet Rowe, CMS Rep. We have also appointed a Rep for the Western Area PAC and have approached a member to take this on in the north, to improve Union communications with our peripatetic members.
  48. Union Advice from HQ on parental leave has been published on the Suffolk website. At present, the entitlement is to leave of absence without pay, and in most cases reasonable operation of the LEA's "special leave" policy would be advantages. Next April, however, new regulations will enable teachers (and all workers) to claim parental leave with pay.
  49. Section 188 Up-date: (i) Proceeding to selection for the new Pipers' Vale situation (Raeburn/Orwell Jnr). Roger Mackay and Div Sec. have been seeking to secure no unacceptable departure from the established Section 188 procedure, even though the merger had been anticipated by several temporary appointments. (ii) Gt Finborough: resolved by voluntary means. (iii) Stratford St Mary resolved by voluntary means. (iv) St Felix, still under consideration but there are several volunteers.
  50. *NUT Facilities time: The Division has 200 days for this current financial year. Secretary has asked AA to repeat the same allocations as last year. This includes 10 days to Leiston Middle School for the time being.
  51. JNC Convenor, facilities: Secretary also asked AA to consider a separate allowance for Penny Cook as JNC convenor, rather than take her JNC duty time from the NUT allocation. The LEA has now agreed to increase Penny's allowance as JNC convenor to 8 days per year.
  52. A copy of the rules and the Annual Report as passed at the AGM 2002 has been sent to HQ. Grant Forms also submitted (although a little late). The form provided did not mention "Unity Officer".
  53. *Forward Planning: School Representatives' Training. Ipswich Association have pencilled in Friday 14th June for a Southern Area Session.
  54. Note that moderation of the SEN Audit is beginning shortly. This is where the greatest workload is likely to impact.
  55. Casework: Secretary is supporting memebrs in two enquiries in the Northern Area.
  56. Card from Maggie Freeman thanking the Division "for the unexpected and wonderful presentation made to me at the AGM. They have all been much admired and will be treasured by me in the future".
  57. dotUnity Agenda: Local Action: Secretary has written to NASUWT and ATL County Secretaries suggesting joint area meetings this term in the county. NASUWT has responded but not sure. No response from ATL. Re. Unity Officer, Secretary is still seeking advice on the need to appoint a Unity Officer for the Division. There appears to be no rule or regulation from HQ requiring this, although Associations have had to make such an appointment, for grant purposes.
  58. dot REPORT FROM THE TEACHER REPRESENTATIVES: received from Andrew Guite:
    SUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL Learning For Life Theme Panel Wednesday 20th March 2002
    14-19 Education: This was an opportunity for the Panel to consider the implications for the County Council of the proposals set out in the Green Paper 14-19: extending opportunities, raising standards. David Peachey introduced this item giving an overview. He said that there was a need to start to identify the issues that Suffolk has to deal with in terms of 14-19 education. These were
    · School Organisation - best use of resources
    · School Improvement - the EDP, the targets and action plan; support and advice services to schools
    · Continuity and Progression - especially for pupils with SEN (this he considered was a more complex and underdeveloped area)
    · Admissions and Access - making sure that students were in the right place at the right time
    · Partnership - engagement with other agencies
    · Role of County Councillors as representatives - to ensure what is built up meets the needs of the young people who are their constituents.
    This was followed by an excellent presentation on Curriculum Development for 14-19 year olds by Liz Francis (County Advisor for 14-19 Education). She outlined the main proposals in the Green Paper and many of the implications for the education service. Mike Bax (Executive Director of the Suffolk Learning & Skills Council then gave a presentation about the role of the LSC. Marilyn Watsham (Assistant Principal Further & Adult Education Suffolk College) who put forward the college perspective followed him. Her presentation included some interesting information about vocational courses as well as the academic curriculum. Finally Hazel Mackintosh for Suffolk Connexions gave a presentation about the role of the Connexions Service. This was followed by Members questions to the presenters. The Chair promised that the Panel would give further consideration to this matter at a future meeting (in fact the next meeting on Tuesday 7th May).
    OFSTED Inspection of the County Council - Post Inspection Action Plan: Panel members then made comments on the draft action plans that had been produced in response to the seven recommendations made by the OFSTED inspection team and approved the arrangements for monitoring and evaluating the plan
    . The Pattern of the School Year: Consultation Arrangements: At the last meeting of the Theme Panel members had asked for the opportunity to consider the consultation strategy to be used in seeking local views on the proposed move to a six-term year. David Thornton outlined the arrangements that were set out in a paper presented to members. The consultation was carefully defined, it sought to determine a distinctive Suffolk view of the proposal. Amongst those to be consulted would be School staff associations (i.e. teacher and other staff unions); headteacher management forums; school governors, teachers and all other school staff. An individual letter would go to all staff with key messages, with an opportunity to respond with concerns (short questionnaire with open-ended questions). He stressed that it was not a referendum. Other LEAs are working to the same time scale of a 30th June deadline that had been set by the LGA. The County Council's Executive Committee would make the final decision on what would be Suffolk's response to the proposed move to a six-term year.
    The meeting of the Learning for Life Theme Panel on Wednesday 10th July is likely to include items on Education other than at school, including for vulnerable children [including sick and excluded children, children educated by their parents and learning for vulnerable children and young people]; Provision for children with autism; and Provision for children with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. If you would like any further information on any of the issues raised in this meeting, please do not hesitate to contact any of us.
  59. SCC Papers received
    L02/4 the Pattern of the School Year: Proposed Changes (2)
    L02/8 and E02.38 dotPost-OFSTED Action Plan for the County Council
    L02/10 dotThe Pattern of the School Year: Consultation Arrangements
    L02/13 LfL Panel matters considered by other bodies
    L02/9 Cultural Strategy: Learning Priorities
    E02/30 Fair Funding Phrase 3 Changes
    E02/39 Join Use of Sports Centres on school sites
    E02/47 dotRenewing contract with NTAS (National Teaching and Advisory Service)
    Section D: Other reports
  60. dot Courses and Conferences: Derek Merril to report on "Respect is not enough".
  61. Student Recruitment: Christine Lloyd to report.dot Written report available at the meeting. Christine is concerned that the funding allocated to schools for receiving SCITT students no longer pays for a temporary point for experienced teachers to act as mentors. Many schools prefer to use the funding (about £500 per term) to pay for supply rather than allocate temporary points..
  62. dot Health & Safety: John Osborne Next County Safety Meeting, 3rd July, 2.00pm. John agreed to attend the Executive Meeting to discuss furthering the Division's H&S agenda.
    Section E: Local Associations
  63. * Annual reports received from Bury St Edmunds, Ipswich, Lowestoft, SE Suffolk, Sudbury and Waveney & Yoxford Associations. Form 106 (accounts) received from BSE, Lowestoft, Sudbury and Waveney & Yoxford Associations.
  64. Bury St Edmunds, Ipswich, SE Suffolk, and Sudbury Associations were represented at Conference.

dot Part 2: Decision Making

Agenda Item 4: Confirmation / Amendment of EC recommendations from EC meeting: including:

Agenda item 5: Action arising from National Matters

a) Post-threshold progression: information and support for members

b) Unity agenda: local response

c) 14-19 Green Paper (circulated): Discussion

Agenda item 6. Action arising from Regional and Local Matters

a) 6-term year: Gathering of views and response to SCC consultation

b) Plan of work 2002-2003 Update and report on availability of premises: Stowmarket Learning Centre is booked for today, May 23rd and June 20th. Availability of SSPDC in the Autumn still awaited. September meeting likely to be King Edward VI Upper School, Bury St Edmunds (Conference centre). Membership meeting to be held at SSPDC.

Forward Planning: Racism Working Party.

Any other business from Part 1.

Date of next meeting: May 23rd 2002, Stowmarket Learning Centre (confirmed)

INDEX / SEARCH

HOMEPAGE